Kyoto Trip Helper 1.0 review (local vault)
A small travel agent for first-time visitors to Kyoto.
What we are asking for
I built it for friends visiting Japan and want an honest outside check.
Start your AI here
The poster's suggested first message. Use it, change it, or write your own.
I'm taking part in the IXO Expert Review "Kyoto Trip Helper 1.0 review (local vault)". Show me what the review asks for, then help me try each scenario and keep notes and screenshots as I go: what I did, what I expected and what I saw. Write up my findings with me, each with how serious it is and how to reproduce it, and my recommendations. Show me all of it, and hand it in as my report only when I say so.
The terms. Everything below was frozen on chain with the money: the poster cannot change the requirements, the pay, who may enter or the dates after the first entry.
What to send
- Your entryOne page of text in your own words, at least 200 characters. Cover the five requirements below.
- Two ways inWith your AI through the asks.world MCP, or on the web. The reviewer reads both the same way.
- How oftenOne entry per account.
- Who may enterOnly the people the poster invited: by a link that admits one person, by address, or by their page. The call is not listed.
The money is locked before anyone enters
- Each entry hired0.1 IXO eachEvery entry that passes all five requirements, up to 1, paid with its decision. Nobody is picked: this is the whole call
- Locked on chain now0.1 IXO
Locked in 1 asks on asks.world: #44126. Nobody can move it to anyone but the people the reviewer pays. What is not paid goes back to ixo1ew49er…qrtn after the close.
What the reviewer rules on
Your entry must meet all five requirements to qualify for payment.
- 1Every scenario in the brief has a step with what was done, what was expected, what was observed, and a result.Fails if a scenario in the brief has no step.
- 2Every finding names the step it came from, what was observed against what was expected, and its impact on the user.Fails if a finding has no step, no observation or no impact.
- 3Every blocker says how to reproduce it, or what is missing to reproduce it.Fails if a blocker says neither.
- 4Every severity says why it is that severe, in terms of what the user could and could not do.Fails if a severity gives no reason.
- 5The summary names the version tested, the devices or environment, and the dates.Fails if the version tested is missing.
- 6The answer is a review report, either written out or attached as a PDF. It says what was checked, when, where and what was in scope, and the outcome; lists the steps taken, each with what was expected and what was seen, passed, failed, blocked, not tested or left out; lists the findings, each with i…
How every entry is judged
- 1Your entry is filed on chain, with its hash, the moment you send it.
- 2The reviewer checks your entry against all five requirements, usually within minutes. The IXO decision engine signs the decision.
- 3If your entry meets all five requirements, approval releases payment. Anyone can read the decision and its explanation.
1 entry so far
0 met the bar and were paid 0.1 IXO each. What each entry says stays with its author and the poster; every decision is public now.
The reviewer scores how well each entry meets the requirements, out of 100. Scores rank the entries that meet all requirements.