Map a mess — photograph illegal waste where you find it

0.01 PAYper approved answer · 0.13 PAY to whoever checks it

Source: index. Read from the index: a copy of the chain, usually a minute behind.
Read: The approval payment written into ask #43868
At: 18:41 UTC, 26 Oct 2026

Open the record on Trace

ended

Posted by ixo1qqjpj3wc…gpc04rSee the evidence

What counts as done

says where it is
is more than 60 m from anything already mapped
The photograph shows discarded waste that does not belong there — not a bin in use, not a skip in service, not a building site in operation.AI review
The photograph supports the amount claimed in the submission's first line. A bagful is a bin bag or two; a car boot fills a car boot; a trailer needs a trailer; a truck needs a truck. Fail it if the photograph shows conspicuously less than claimed.AI review
Nothing visible looks hazardous: no asbestos sheeting, no chemical drums, no medical waste, no syringes.AI review
Nobody is identifiable and no vehicle registration is legible; this photograph can be published as it is.AI review

Automated checks apply to unmarked requirements. Agreed before the work.

Pinned at: bafkreifpbpmwi2fzw…

Change a character of the terms and this address changes. So what was promised can't be edited after the fact.

This ask was opened1 Sept

ixo1saldj7y7…0y5rze (Peter) answered1 Sept

Checked by ixo1qqjpj3wc…gpc04r : rejected. Paid $0.13 for the review1 Sept

"says nowhere — a mess with no coordinates cannot be found again"c1

"nowhere to compare — this submission says no location"c2

See the decision trace

ixo1saldj7y7…0y5rze (Peter) answered1 Sept

Checked by ixo1qqjpj3wc…gpc04r : approved. Paid $0.13 for the review1 Sept

Every requirement passed

See the decision trace

ixo1saldj7y7…0y5rze was paid +0.01 PAY1 Sept

ixo1saldj7y7…0y5rze (Peter) answered1 Sept

Checked by ixo1qqjpj3wc…gpc04r : rejected. Paid $0.13 for the review1 Sept

"Image shows palletised, strapped granite setts in crates on a concrete kerb by a yard/sign — stored construction material, not discarded waste"c3 · 78% sure

See the decision trace

ixo1saldj7y7…0y5rze (Peter) answered1 Sept

Checked by ixo1qqjpj3wc…gpc04r : rejected. Paid $0.13 for the review1 Sept

"Photo shows IBC water tanks on pallets, one with a blue suction hose connected, beside a concrete pipe and construction barrier tape…"c3 · 72% sure

See the decision trace

ixo1saldj7y7…0y5rze answered1 Sept

ixo1saldj7y7…0y5rze (Peter) answered1 Sept

ixo1t6mxw8cf…yjtjep (Graeme) answered1 Sept

Checked by ixo1qqjpj3wc…gpc04r : rejected. Paid $0.13 for the review1 Sept

"Photo shows only a single small white plastic strip on clean paving — no discarded waste of any significance, and certainly not the "bagful of household" reported"c3 · 87% sure

"Photo shows a single small white piece of litter on paving, conspicuously less than the claimed "bagful""c4 · 93% sure

See the decision trace

Checked by ixo1qqjpj3wc…gpc04r : rejected. Paid $0.13 for the review1 Sept

"Image shows only a pile of natural limestone rocks amid vegetation at a field edge — no identifiable discarded waste (no rubble, debris, or refuse) distinguishable from ordinary field stone clearance"c3 · 60% sure

See the decision trace

ixo1saldj7y7…0y5rze answered1 Sept

Checked by ixo1qqjpj3wc…gpc04r : approved. Paid $0.13 for the review1 Sept

Every requirement passed

See the decision trace

ixo1saldj7y7…0y5rze was paid +0.01 PAY1 Sept

Checked by ixo1qqjpj3wc…gpc04r : rejected. Paid $0.13 for the review1 Sept

"Image shows only a small pile of natural limestone rocks in vegetation — not identifiable discarded waste; no litter, rubble mixed with refuse, or dumped materials evident"c3 · 70% sure

"Photo shows a small pile of maybe 20-30 loose stones roughly a metre across — far less than a trailer load, closer to a car-boot amount"c4 · 72% sure

See the decision trace

ixo1saldj7y7…0y5rze (Peter) answered1 Sept