Asks

Sandbox · nothing here is real money · How does this work?

The ask
Approved

Expert review: Qi.space: first-time Topics and Topic recipes review

Decision trace

26 Oct · from answer to payment in about 17 hours. Each step is signed or recorded.

  1. Mykhailo Pronka sent the work

    Recorded as bafkreig…xz4i.

    0 s
  2. asks.world verifier gathered the facts

    6 AI reviews by openai/gpt-6-luna scored 99, 99, 99, 99, 99 and 99 out of 100. The facts were frozen before deciding. The verifier's record

    17 s
  3. IXO decision engine approved it

    10 of 10 rules met, against rules fixed before the work began.

    • Handed over: met
    • Long enough: met
    • Report received: met
    • Approved by a person: met
    • 6 judged by AI: met
    Every rule in full
    • Something was handed over: metmeasured
    • Long enough for what the ask asked: metmeasured
    • Every scenario in the brief has a step with what was done, what was expected, what was observed, and a result. Fail this only if a scenario in the brief has no step.: metAI review
    • Every finding names the step it came from, what was observed against what was expected, and its impact on the user. Fail this only if a finding has no step, no observation or no impact.: metAI review
    • Every blocker says how to reproduce it, or what is missing to reproduce it. Fail this only if a blocker says neither.: metAI review
    • Every severity says why it is that severe, in terms of what the user could and could not do. Fail this only if a severity gives no reason.: metAI review
    • The summary names the version tested, the devices or environment, and the dates. Fail this only if the version tested is missing.: metAI review
    • The answer is a review report, either written out or attached as a PDF. It says what was checked, when, where and what was in scope, and the outcome; lists the steps taken, each with what was expected and what was seen, passed, failed, blocked, not tested or left out; lists the findings, each with its impact and a severity of blocker, major or minor with why, and every major finding says how to reproduce it (a blocker says how, or what is missing to reproduce it); gives recommendations, each with a priority and what would show it is done; and gives the review's limitations. It also has these sections: "First-time understanding", "Scenario coverage and assistance", "Prioritised UX improvements".: metAI review
    • A review report was sent, as structured text or a PDF: metmeasured
    • A person approved the answer: metmeasured
    17 h
  4. Signed by the decision engine

    decision-engine.testnet.ixo.earth. The signature checks out against its published key. Check it

    17 h
  5. 1.00 IXO released to Mykhailo Pronka

    From the money held on the ask, paid the moment it was approved.

    17 h

Full engine trace pinned by hash b0fcddfb…

Work bafkreigg5qq3own3eiuxmixdxorjkrbhkgi3ksmr44ve5o6xtfd4egxz4i Verify Trace

Decision bafkreibx4chr4hgbewjftxsl42h4u7ij42fhzuqerd4yrxb4bsb5url4re Verify

Expert review: Qi.space: first-time Topics and Topic recipes review

for Expert review: Qi.space: first-time Topics and Topic recipes review

1 IXOper approved answer
Source
index. Read from the index, a copy of the ledger usually a minute behind.
Read
The approval payment written into ask #44143
At
16:49 UTC, 27 Oct 2026
Open the public record
ended

1 of 5 answers paid · 1 rejection

Source
index. Read from the index, a copy of the ledger usually a minute behind.
Read
The answers sent on ask #44143 and their decisions, against its quota
At
16:49 UTC, 27 Oct 2026
Open the public record
answer IDbafkreigg5qq3own3eiuxmixdxorjkrbhkgi3ksmr44ve5o6xtfd4egxz4i
decision traceHow it was decided
answer IDbafkreib23mzvhqsffhdtyxkdkqwjeu53wzvuordqepmseflvmcufrxm3nq
decision traceHow it was decided

Receipt #44143 · read from the public network index · checkable by anyone with this link. Open the record on IXO Trace